No proprietary black box. No vanity score. The method below is the entire system — what we read, how we weigh it, and what we hand back.
Organization, Product, FAQ, BreadcrumbList, Article — validated against schema.org and the latest generative-engine guidance.
Does the site declare what it is, who runs it, and how it relates to other named entities? We score sameAs, knowsAbout, and disambiguation density.
Heading hierarchy, semantic landmarks, table-of-contents signals, and the answer-first patterns LLMs prefer when summarising.
We render the page the way ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity render it — then measure what survived.
Author bylines, source links, original data, quotable lines. Pages with citation surface get quoted; pages without get paraphrased.
datePublished, dateModified, sitemap lastmod, and the cadence between them. Stale sites lose to fresh ones — even at lower authority.
We render up to 250 of your most-trafficked pages with a headless engine that mimics OpenAI's, Anthropic's and Perplexity's crawlers.
Each page passes through the six pillars. Pillar scores roll up into a 0–100 composite, weighted by how each engine actually cites in your category.
We hand back a ranked list of fixes — the smallest changes with the largest expected lift on AI visibility. Most are one-line edits.
Run the audit again in thirty days. We diff the result and tell you which fixes moved the needle. No fixes, no charge for the re-read.
One audit is free. No card, no onboarding call, no sales follow-up.
Begin audit